H&M: The Answer to Ethical Fashion?

If you read my post on Topshop you’ll know how I feel about the injustice of the fashion industry. We’re  people who want to find a different way of living that allows others to live too, through thinking bigger and living deeper. Now H&M has jumped on the ethical clothing bandwagon, could they hold the long-awaited answer on how to shop ethically and sustainably?

I’ve just read this article from The Guardian website, and to be honest I’m impressed with H&M’s desire to move towards a more ethical way of doing ‘fast fashion’. As the second largest clothing retailer in the world, they seem to be breaking the mould just by addressing the issue, unlike our good friends at Topshop. This year, 7.6% of the cotton H&M used in their garments was organic, more than any other retailer. By 2020 they aim to rocket that figure to 100%. Recycled polyester equivalent to 9.2 million plastic bottles has been used, as well as lower-impact water-based solvents for nearly 2.5 million pairs of shoes. This is all good stuff. H&M seem to be moving in the right direction.

But a quote from Helena Helmersson, Head of Sustainability, really jarred with me. ‘You see my dream is to be perceived as a company who can offer all people in the world – even those without much money – the possibility to dress really well and sustainably. That’s how I want people to perceive us, not as a brand connected to mass consumption.’

Firstly, I think she’s contradicted herself here. How can H&M aim to clothe the entire world without being connected to mass consumption? Surely selling more clothes means more buy-in to the consumer world. H&M already have 2,500 stores in 44 countries, and aim to increase this number by 10 to 15 % each year; hardly an attempt at minimising mass consumption.

Secondly, I think this statement uncovers one of the most destructive cores of the fashion industry: the belief that we should all be fashionable. This is what drives the garment industry. It takes consumers to be dissatisfied with what they’ve already got because it’s no longer ‘in’, no longer the current trend. The fashion industry thrives on people who are ready to believe that they need to keep up with what’s in and what’s out. This is our consumer sickness. What this quote says to me is: It is more important that people are well dressed than it is for them to have access to basic human rights. And something about that doesn’t feel right.

I really admire what H&M are doing, and I firmly believe that more companies should be taking the issue of ethical fashion seriously. But Lucy Siegel concludes her Guardian article with this statement: “Full marks for ambition. But do I buy H&M as an ethical paragon? Not quite yet. They are still clinging to too many parts of the fast-fashion supply chain to bring anything revolutionary.” And I would have to agree. 

This entry was posted in The Village Square and tagged , , , , , .
  • http://twitter.com/Jack_Wakefield Jack Wakefield

    An exciting first step though! To acknowledge change is needed and to have the ambition to lead the way is bold in itself. I hope they do find a way to work out the contradictions in their statement and bring ethics and high-street-chains together :D

  • http://www.facebook.com/jaybutcher Jay Butcher

    Interesting article…I’m wondering why they want to be “perceived” and not “known” as a brand that connects with the wider world…perhaps a small thing there though.

    Also not sure why using organic cotton is a good thing.  Wouldn’t fairly traded cotton be a better standard as that also has high environmental standards and deals specifically with the human worker element of the product.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Alex-White/640746982 Alex White

    This is a fantastic article and fantastic news. That H &
    M are acknowledging the growing demand and niche for ethical clothing is excellent.
    You’re right that this is all good stuff! But I don’t think I agree with your
    criticisms – it’s true that H & M are buying into the consumer world, and
    it’s true that they’re selling an idea that everyone has to be fashionable. It’s
    also true that everyone in Christ knows that their identity is eternally in God,
    not in the transitory consumerism and vanity of this world; but that doesn’t
    mean we shouldn’t support H & M’s efforts.

    It would be wonderful if H & M decided to stop producing
    so many clothes, stop using advertising which makes us feel like we need to
    look awesome to have fun, and started handing out gospel tracts at the tills –
    but that’s probably not going to happen soon! I think we need to celebrate
    every advance and victory we get, and this is one.  If their Conscious Collection is their best-selling
    ever, what will happen? Surely it means that they will continue to brand
    themselves as the ethical choice? And surely this means that they will improve
    their supply chain? If they don’t, we’ll hold them to account, and hopefully
    then they will.

    So let’s all get down to H & M to buy some of their
    Conscious Collection, then lets email them and ask for more.

  • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=882465091 James Cobbett

    Great article, I too have been struggling to quite work out H&M in regards to ethics recently. They certainly talk about it a lot, and I can’t think of another company who’s head of sustainability is quite so public as Helena Helmersson. They do seem to be doing some good things, and it is great to see that they do seem to be taking this issue seriously. But there have been a few other Helmersson quotes that haven’t quite sat right with me too.

    • http://twitter.com/IAmKatieLouise Katie McCallum

      Do I sense another blog post coming along? :)  

  • Jo Lucas

    It seems to me that H&M are seeing a whole in the market for people who want guilt free shopping and are more than happy to fill it with lots of promises by a highly paid spin doctor!

  • Pingback: Fashion the Way Forward - Rhythms

  • Pingback: Fashion Against AIDS - Rhythms

  • Anna Strain

    Really interesting article. It’s so sad how consumerism has infiltrated almost every sector of society, even to the extent where it becomes more significant to some than for everyone to have basic human rights. That’s really awful, and although I think H and M are doing a good thing, we’re too focused on seeing the world from our western, consumerist perspective, and not from God’s. There’s more important things than fashion, and if these stores are really to become ethical than they need to change their way of thinking, and the motivator behind that. 

    • Huw Tyler

      That’s a great comment! Thanks Anna.
      What do you think about the new collection? Would love to hear more of your thoughts here: http://village.rhythms.org/noticeboard/fashion-against-aids/

  • Laura Williams

    I don’t think Helena Helmersson is saying the whole world has to be in fashion, I think she’s saying that it’s good for people to look good. However consumerism and self image is something that has to be tackled on a global scale. Our confidence can’t depend on S/S A/W, and they need to take responsibility for this too.

  • Adam Baker

    i get frustrated when companies and others release only some products FT and all just to make a few people “feel” better about there purchase of the goods. It will take consumers to be more radical and not buy un-ethical goods and only FT/ethical goods.

    T shirts may cost more and choice might be reduced, but people will not be exploited when consumers live lives that raise the bar

  • Zoe Miles
    • Huw Tyler

      Thanks Zoe! A really interesting article and great to keep up to date with this